ProALL Legal Services: 2019

Thursday, December 26, 2019

KLM mishap Cape Town

Cc: Hans Antonson, Attorney at law

Dear KLM

I am a flight commander retired, and I can sympathise with the situation we all found ourself in.

However,

Relevant information was nil - what was - was excuses only.

The decision to abort should have been taken att ETD +2h - not 4. It is my experience that an engine non start up situation will not be solved "swift and easy" at a remote location.

Busses should at least be ready ETD +2h but Instead after 4h we had to wait another 2h for luggage and transport.

My check in at Holiday inn CT was not until 7:00 in the morning.

I was told the next flight would be next night so I thought I would get some rest….but before we reached the hotel it was then said we should leave already at 13:15!!! ie. afternoon the same day. Not well thought through and on top of that on a 30h journey over Doha.

I have several safety concerns over being on traveling foot for almost 2,5 full days/nights without proper sleep.

As a consequence I had to use over 2h after hotel check in to redirect my flight for a better offer. Communication with KLM was difficult to establish.

We finally agreed to BA 15h over Heathrow.

I then had to organise airport transfer myself.

I went without my diabetes medication for 2 days which have week long consequences.

One extra dinner was required at Balducci's WA - about 500ZAR

I lost more than 2 effective work days in best shopping X-mas time at our venue www.fridhemgaard.com

Hereby I ask €600 as compensation.

The BA service was then flawless - as I'm used to from my favourite airline KLM - on all previous occasions.

Best regards Anders Paulsson, flight commander, retired.

Merry Christmas to all!

Monday, July 15, 2019

From: Kundärende

Subject: Ditt ärende är nu mottaget - #795187

Date: 15 July 2019 at 17:05:01 GMT+2

To: anders@fridhemgaard.com

Reply-To: kund@trafikverket.se

Vi har tagit emot ditt ärende 2019-07-15.

Ärendet gäller:

Hej Trafikverket.

Jag hade idag en obehaglig upplevelse när jag hamlade pil vid min mark Sa Håslöv 6:2 (Fastighet 6:6 Forshällavägen 265)
En Vit Volvo herrgårdsvagn smög upp bakom mig, passerade och backade tillbaka med rutan nedvevad. Två ovårdade individer satt i.
- Hamlar du pil eller vad det heter?
- Ja, jag snyggar till lite svarade jag, vem är ni?
- Vi är från vägverket. (Heter det inte Trafikverket?)
- Vem sköter vägen?
- Det finns visst en vägförening men den är ganska passiv.
- Vi kommer att dra in stödet bara så du vet. Träden gör intrång på vägmarken.
- Ja, ja vet jag är ute och hamlar. Vem är ni? Kan jag få se legitimation?
- Nej det har vi inte men du kan få mitt namn.
- Vad är det värt, Ni är ytterst ohövliga och oprofessionella. Faller ni under JO?
Ja det gör vi kanske, ska du JO anmäla oss? OSV.

Nu undrar jag om jag pratade med gårdstjuvar som var ute och rekognoserade eller om det verkligen är ert folk.
Tiden var runt 15:00 Måndagen den 15/7.

Skulle det vara era tjänstemän (gud förbjude) så önskar jag deras namn för JO anmälan.

Mvh, Anders Paulsson
c/o Wettermark
Fridhem Gård
Forshällavägen 265
235 91 Vellinge

0723 726137

PS. Detta meddelande går även till min advokat Hans Antonson.

En helt oacceptabel bit Skånsk pile allé enl. Trafikverket.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Till: Anders Håkansson Lagos, Portugal 27/1 2019

Förrättningslantmätare.

Kontaktuppgift erhållen efter samtal med Peter Johansson: peter@fmbab.se

Cc: Adv. Hans Antonson, markägare och intressenter.

Godmorgon, Anders.

Ang. E.Ons ersättningsförslag Sa. Håslöv 6:2.

Föreliggande förutsättning: E.Ons ledningsdragning över Sa.Håslöv 6:2 kommer att bli föremål för granskning av EU domstol.

Anledning till detta inlägg. Ersättningsfrågan.

Markkomprimering är avsevärd.
Vår arrendator sade upp arrendet i samband med att E.On förde upp den nya ledningen. Inkomst bortfall ca: 250.000 per år.
Ledningen skall enl. alla remissinstanser mark-läggas - förordat av 2 kommuner, landstinget samt E.Ons egen konsult Energo Retea.
Befintliga ledningar med 4 stolpar per grupp är ej godkända av Länstyrelsen och materialet skall vara trä - inte komposit.
Ledningen som är sänkt för hinderfrihet till vårt flygfält, hänger för lågt över vår mark för en 130/200 kV enl. konsulterad teknisk expertis.
Ledningsdragningen stör vår planering för ny mangårdsbyggnad och maskinhall. ca: 90 m söder om dragningen.
Den praktiskt organiska obstruktionen på vår odlingsmark är avsevärt större än vad E.On medger. Tänk en svag, med maskin körbar kurva runt den fysiska uppvallade obstruktionerna - gissningsvis 2X8X8m i det visade fallet, och endast något mindre för de två på marken mitt-placerade stolp-kvadranterna.

8X8 m

E.On är också i konflikt med vår sedan länge planerade bäck-utdikning i samarbete med Naturcentrum och Länstyrelsen, då man förbjudet oss utbyggnaden av densamma.

Något som ger fortsatt översvämningsrisk samt motarbetar öringens vandring i bäcken.

Naturcentrums utredning.

Vi hemställer härmed att Lantmäteriet inför vår EU anmälan gör en juridiskt hållbar genomlysning av vår situation med E.On med verifierade mätningar på plats kompletterade med dokumenterade belägg för vad som från Lantmäteriet medgivits E.On.

Mvh, Anders Paulsson & Karin Paulsson, Markägare Södra Håslöv 6:2.

Anders Paulsson
Fridhem Gaard 1877

c/o Wettermark
Forshällavägen 265
235 91 Vellinge, Sweden

PT +351 91 3259811
SE +46 723 726137
anders@fridhemgaard.com
www.fridhemgaard.com

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Nätägarna.

För referens:
Inflationen är ca 2%
En årlig 7% ökning är lika med en fördubbling över 10 år.
För närvarande höjer bolagen med 10% om året - det har dom ett korrupt domstolsutslag på.

Other E.ON stories: No rocket engineering!

You don’t have to be a rocket engineer to figure out that if the whole neighbourhood go from oil heating to heat-exchanger technology, as we did here in the eighties, there will be an increased power demand on the grid.
Former owner to Sa. Håslöv 6:5 (where plaintiffs Magnus Ringman and Jan Andersson now lives) installed a heat exchanger in the mid eighties. After the installation she battled with E.ON about the power supply, as the electric motor protection on the exchanger compressor released frequently - which is several times a day. Anyone with some imagination would recognize that this is a major inconvenience especially during winter.

E.ON rejected all responsibility and the poor private electrical installer, Bengt Jönsson had to battle for years to find the problem. He sent bills to - make no mistake.

FINALLY E.ON admitted that the grid was too weak and exchanged the transformer. No problem with the engine protection ever since.

You can’t sue an oligopoly for lack of infrastructure, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Other E.ON stories: The Jan-Erik Olsson ¨investigation¨

This entry is not about Jan-Erik Olsson and his primary problem with E.ON, as irritating as it must have been for him. This is about when Jan-Erik looked for support for his case at the "Konsumenternas elrådgivningsbyrå" (Swedish electricity consumers advisory board).

Now, what great advise could this multi-million institution provide poor Jan-Erik in his agony and despair?

The institution promptly ask the E.ON customer ombudsman to make an investigation!!! - and, as the official deliver this example of bold, aggressive and resolute action, he also states that they get hundreds of similar complaints every year. ProALL wonder why....

We say, why bother to complain even to the government institutions, ¨Allmänna Reklamations Byrån¨ (and we doubt that there is any such thing in any other country than Sweden), seldom address disputes over once registered power consumption.

Now get this - E.ON is an monopoly - the people dine together.

You can´t sue an monopoly for branch corruption, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Other E.ON stories: E.ON customer service threatens customers

If you suspect your meter is in error as Princia Bengtsson in Malmo did when she recieved a bill for 62 000 SEK, E.ON threatened her that she would carry the investigation cost, should nothing be found to be wrong with her meter.

Who is controlling the meter you might ask.... E.ON is. Great work E.ON.

According to E.ON the fault margin is allowed at 5% up or down.
ProALL say NO WAY E.ON, you are not allowed to bill for an extra 5%. If you install inaccurate equipment the error margin is on your account- period!

Read more in Sweden: SDS

You can´t sue an oligopoly for over charges, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Other E.ON stories: Child left in the cold

Eon, on a dispute with a friend over a ridiculous E.ON bill, promptly shut off the electric power in mid-winter for the family with a small child in the house.

The bill had to be paid in order for the family to be able to stay in their house. There was never any investigation where as the E.ON claim was just or not, only a brute power demonstration from Eon and its hengemen of engineers.

Eskom in Africa look like a nice bunch in comparison, and E.ON power delivery is also well in par with Eskom standards.

You can´t sue an oligopoly for lack of social responsibility, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Other E.ON stories: Power failures

About five years ago there was major disturbance on the E.ON net in Vellinge. Power went on and off sometimes 50-60 times a day. We often actually had to pull the main to protect our equipment. At the time we had about 8 to 9 fridges and freezers at the farm, and we also used a projector for presentations (worth 36000 SEK). Vegetables was wasted and ice cream melted and we could after awhile not use the freezers for anything for the rest of that year, as everything frequently had to be thrown away.

The projector had a lamp and an LED screen that was supposed to be cooled by a fan for about 3 minutes after power off, this did of course not happen, when the power source failed. The projector overheated and broke twice and was then repaired, at the third time it was not regarded viable to fix by Philips and had to be scrapped - this was after only two years of use...

Did E.ON take responsibility? No, of course not, the amount of B...S... that we had to listen to was too much, and eventually you just turned away and went on with your life.

We now see that this is the major business plan of Eon. Others always have to pay for Eon:s neglect, in this case us, our tenants, Philips and Expert - the vendor.

Later it was disclosed (by ashamed Eon officials) that parts of the E.ON net in Vellinge with an expected lifespan of about 50 years, has now been in operation for well over 70 years, and E.ON only replace the parts that fail on occasion, as they fail.

You can´t sue an oligopoly for corporate neglect, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Other E.ON stories: E.ON transformer on fire

As I was busy with rebuild work at the farm, a thunderbolt strikes the E.ON transformer situated in our field.

I call E.ON to report the damage. This is how it goes down:

Me: Your transformer has been hit by lightning, We are out of power.
E.ON desk: Have you checked your fuses? The lady asks.
Me: Dont have to ma'm - I saw the bolt strike your transformer.
E.ON desk: You need to check your fuses.
Me: I don't think so - Your transformer is on fire...
E.ON desk: We have our procedures how to go about how to find the problem. Check your fuses.

I gave in, hung up after a few more very well chosen words, and took the day off from using any power - as I recognized that this was going to be a long-haul.

As the whole village was out of power others reported the damage, obviously after checking their fuses, and thus the fire brigade could be called out and engineers sent to ADDRESS THE PROBLEM. Great work E.ON.

You can´t sue an oligopoly for employee stupidity, or can you?

Join ProALL!

Thursday, December 26, 2019

KLM mishap Cape Town

Monday, July 15, 2019

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Thursday, January 10, 2019

AddThis

Antonson

Anmälan Svensk Myndighet

BYT EL-LEVERANTÖR HÄR:

Vårt Miljö & Etiska El Val

Vi utvärderar i sammarbete med Tesla:

ProALL is gearing up...

Blog Archive